做厙TV sociologist researches the effects of racialized border practices on Canadian Muslims
Published: May 1, 2017
A 做厙TV sociologist is investigating the effects of racialized border practices on identity and citizenship of Canadian Muslims.
做厙TV Mississauga Professor Paula Maurutto and co-researcher Baljit Nagra of the University of Ottawa are following up on their previous research on travel and Muslim identity.
Back in 2016, in which they interviewed 50 young Canadians who are Muslim between the ages of 18 and 31 living in Vancouver and Toronto. At the time, interviewees reported that they felt fearful they would be stripped of their rights and said they felt a lack of ability to freely assert their religious identities when travelling.
Our interviewees referred to being repeatedly stopped, questioned, detained and harassed by security personnel, Maurutto says. They felt that any evidence of their Muslim identity name, country of birth, appearance or clothing made them a target for extra surveillance.
Researchers found that respondents made a point of moderating their religious or cultural identities when travelling. In some cases, this meant trimming beards for men, and forgoing a hijab or choosing a colourful scarf instead of a black one for women, as well as adopting a more North American style of dress. Respondents said the negative border experiences often served to reinforce their religious and cultural identities. About 30 per cent of interviewees said their Muslim identity had been a focal point of their identity before 9/11, but 68 per cent reported identifying more strongly as Muslim and feeling a deeper connection to their faith after 9/11, due to feelings about needing to protect their faith.
They reported taking on more of an identity to counteract perceptions and human rights complaints. Women who had not worn headscarves became politicized and began wearing them as a political statement, Maurutto says.
The researchers are taking another look at the effects of racialized border practices. Currently, they are looking at the effect of C-51 on Muslim travellers. Passed in 2007, the legislation expanded the Canadian Passenger Protect Program so the government could add anyone to the no-fly list who they suspected might engage in terrorism.
At the time, it was estimated that there were between 500 and 2,000 names on that list, Maurutto says. We dont have current data on who has been added to or removed from the list since then.
Its very difficult to get information about the list people only find out that theyre on it when they are denied a boarding pass, and theres very little recourse to get ones name removed from the list. It has real implications it affects whether people can leave the country for business, to visit family, accompany their children or go abroad for university.
The government has created legislation and practices with a serious impact that hasnt been thought out carefully. Their freedoms are being restricted because they are part of a group. But these are human rights and civil rights violations of people who have legitimate Canadian status. We have to understand how human rights are being violated, and why certain groups are targeted.
Topics
